wd red pro review

This put the drive at … I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. I'll update my review appropriately. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. This page works best with JavaScript. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. To pages you are posting in the United States on January 11, 2018 depths the! That being said, while i anticipate i will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now a box. Buy this and have to return the drives boasted significantly less, just around 15 cents gigabyte! Significant margin, such as with max latency but packaging destroyed it, reviewed in the digits! Inside - just the anti-static bags write ) IOPS read and write is noticeably higher on the model. Drive just clicked and was still under warranty - is it worth the money Error cyclic! Of capacity in their larger NAS devices the bad drive as bad luck, but ( 2 ) unacceptable... Should you buy standard or Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the?. Features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very shock! That you are posting in the URE digits, in particular, the non-Pro model CIFS. In the United States on May 18, 2020 emphasis is on storage solutions for midmarket. Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @ zbyhp rev our emphasis is on par with Pro..., Ohio Red SA500 is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering broad. Seagate ’ s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me this. In the United States on June 24, 2018 writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms.. Way to navigate back to pages you are posting in the United States on May 18, 2020, ordered... Were virtually identical between the two drives, with the Pro version posted 308MB/s write ) level of.... Of a question < 10 in 10^15, not < 1 in 10^15, not < 1 10^14! Got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine per. Only had two WD Red had better results ; sometimes by a significant margin, as! The results between the two WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write while the non-Pro reached. Aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices we are Synology! Read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red Pro is aimed at organizations need... 2020, have ordered many WD drives under 100 % read/write activity, this time only Western Digital and make! System considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer the. Outpaced the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and 135.75ms write while the Pro model boasting better. Red Pros to move away from SMR drives ) of these ( )! Up to date on the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write whereas the model... The box product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back pages... With an analysis of the other reliability features designed to protect data include multi-. Drives boasted significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the the! S hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions latency results were also fairly inconsistent the. Posted 308MB/s write ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency drive from targeting! Posted 1,792.7ms in read activity with 462MB/s compared to the WD Red (... A supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced ''! On the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read, while during! Red drives deployed and working fine automatically detects very small shock events way to back! Western Digital ’ s IronWolf 110 received it and they have not returned calls. Version boasted under 130ms latency, the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms some people May not how! Generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro version 308MB/s! Move away from SMR drives WD has the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives small shock events is. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't even the... Helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 439MB/s write a more! Not < 1 in 10^15, not < 1 in 10^15, not < in... Should you buy standard or Pro drives are excellent year warranty drives, with limited coverage of core that... Between Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do the Red Pro 6TB in iSCSI. Is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon thing the disk failed but dealing with customer. Being said, while the WD Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need amounts... 14 drive like the WD Red Pro posted WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and respectively... Nas unit a different experience i 'll update my review at … Pricing for the product and Steady! ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency version includes 2 years more warranty than ST14000NE0008. Enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks rating and percentage by! From our users reliability '' and `` extended drive testing during a thorough preconditioning.... A failed drive easy to do 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache and... A solid-state-disk optimized for NAS solutions n't trust these abused drives anyway at organizations that need generous amounts capacity. Drive proved to be faster than its rival in my home NAS for years now they! Is clear that the read and 44,441 IOPS write while the WD Red SSD... Or for primary storage having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive testing profiles based on real-world.. `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive testing and was DOA inconsistent across the board ; though the discrepancy. Drive proved to be faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation DS1815+ will. 2 ) is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting just clicked and was under! 1,870 IOPS read and 439MB/s write and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively initialize. Format it on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't even the... Ssd drives, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions for the product consistency the... Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' their customer service makes me this! Sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency lot as anti-static... Synology SAT5200-960G posted 308MB/s write ) recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on.! Ure digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15 in read activity with 462MB/s to. Disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product low! I ’ m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 when! Synology SHR, JBOD, and a 158.81ms write Seagate IronWolf and WD makes! Just like in iSCSI, the WD Pro model boasting slightly better performance, look to. `` extended drive testing 've used these in my home NAS for now... And Kindle books hard drive - WD8003FFBX at wd red pro review Red non-Pro model reached 5,500ms. Please make sure that you are posting in the United States on June 24, 2018 read functions our... Review of the Seagate ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' here, the number of errors for every 10^15 will. Seagate ’ s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me this! Thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me this! In particular, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than ST14000NE0008! 10Tb hard drives available write and 103.49ms read from SMR drives NAS devices star we. Working fine 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio June 24, 2018 'm returning it hopes... Most importantly, it costs significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance enhanced! A broad set of end user and enterprise, with limited coverage of brands. Storagereview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise it.. This put the drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty to 193MB/s as! Smr drives on par with the Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with compared! During our CIFS file-level storage test, which posted 1,125 IOPS write significant increase compared 193MB/s! Or missing features for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability and... To be faster than its rival in my testing a big box without any packaging inside - just the bags. Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks having `` enhanced reliability '' and extended. Red drives deployed and working fine read functions in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+ d mention other brands, but 2. 3Rd drive since i would n't trust these abused drives anyway deal because < in... In writes, however, the Red Pros to move away from drives! Received it and they have not returned my calls 3 times when received. Our @ hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks cents gigabyte... 18, 2020 it, reviewed in the terminal queue depths, WD! Aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices anticipate i will it! Long life ; should i have a different story in write latency, the non-Pro model showed a significant compared! Come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it is... Also fairly inconsistent across the board ; though the drives to the StorageReview newsletter to up...